To the page content

BluGuitar Amp1 Mercury Edition

84

Hybrid Amplifier Head for Electric Guitar

  • Versatile, fully analogue amplifier in pedal format
  • 4 Channels
  • Power: 100 Watts
  • Adjustable boost
  • 3 Integrated footswitches
  • Speaker simulation for recording applications
  • Novel nanotube tube amplifier
  • PowerSoak power reducer
  • Controls: Clean Volume, Overdrive Gain, Overdrive Master, Bass, Middle, Treble, Reverb, Master
  • Switches: Clean / Overdrive, Boost, Reverb
  • Effects: Reverb
  • Speaker outputs: 16 Ohms & 8 ohms (6.3 mm jack)
  • Effect grinding paths: Serial / Parallel
  • Input: 6.3 mm Jack
  • FX Loop Send & Return: 2x 6.3 mm Jack
  • Rec Out / Headphones: 6.3 mm Stereo jack
  • Dimensions (W x D x H): 245 x 192 x 68 mm
  • Weight: 1.2 kg
  • Matching footswitch: Article Nr. 350865 (not included)
Available since September 2018
Item number 446907
Sales Unit 1 piece(s)
Powerrate in W 100 W
Channels 4
Reverb Yes
Effects No
Footswitch Yes
$685
The shipping costs are calculated on the checkout page.
In stock
In stock

This product is in stock and can be shipped immediately.

Standard Delivery Times
1

84 Customer ratings

4.8 / 5

You have to be logged in to rate products.

Note: To prevent ratings from being based on hearsay, smattering or surreptitious advertising we only allow ratings from real users on our website, who have bought the equipment from us.

After logging in you will also find all items you can rate under rate products in the customer centre.

handling

features

sound

quality

62 Reviews

Z
Yes, it sounds like a Marshall!
ZigM 20.08.2023
Background:
Eight years ago, I laughed at the idea of a nanotube giving a class-D amplifier a tube amp sound and feel. I laughed at Thomas Blug and bought a Marshall DSL-20, Bugera, a Laney Lionheart IRT-60, a tweed style amp and a bunch of modelers instead (e.g. Hotone Ampero, Boss GT-1000, Valeton GP-200, NU-X MG-300). But I was never happy. I already owned a JCM-800 and 900 in the past, a valvestate, Vox amps, Marshall JMP-1 etc. I sold them all (except for the Laney). Eight years later, and after watching dozens of videos, I splurged and bought the AMP1 Mercury. When I got it, an ominous feeling came over me. It was light weight and plastic. When I turned it on, I felt like a Christmas tree had lit up. It looked like a toy. My initial feeling was that I had just blown a stack of money...for what...a toy?! To my utter surprise, and after some tweaking, the amp does indeed sound like a Plexi, a JCM800, a Fender-ish tweed and an unidentified modern, high gain tube amp. I kept on thinking that this can't be. I had to constantly do a reality check. At this point, I'd like to apologise to Thomas Blug for doubting his product. I haven't had so much fun with an amp since I first plugged my Strat into a JCM-800 as a teenager.

Yes, it sounds like a Marshall:
I fiddled with the tone knob to get the amp to sound exactly like my JCM800 - cranked. And it did. After figuring out how to use a midi pedal to turn the power soak and effects loop on, it sounds even more like my 80's Marshall rig but better. I can't stop sneaking into my studio for a play. It just sounds great.

Compared to modelers:
With my modelers, my guitars all sounded more or less the same: dead, no dynamics, razor-fuzz-sound. With the Amp1, my Strat sounds like a Strat and my LP sounds like an LP. I hadn't done a scratch-down in decades. A scratch down on my modeler sounds s**t. On the Amp1, you can hear all the nuances immediately as the pick grinds down the strings. When I put the Amp1 through my 2 x 12'' Celestion Greenbacks from the early 70's, the amp roars. It is important to hook up a decent speaker box. Lucky I kept those greenbacks. Even the record-out sounds great into my DAW.

Adjust the settings wisely:
Setting the input levels, gain and the power soak correctly made all the difference. And by the way, all my Marshall amps sounded horrible unless I cranked them up. Even in the late 70's and early 80's, no one could crank a Marshall anywhere unless it was an outdoor gig - and even then, people would complain. At low volume, the big fat Marshall valve amps sounded like an oversized fuzz box. With the Amp1, I can get tube saturation, tube amp dynamics, sagging and overtones at low volume and without the annoying chain saw fuzz of a real Marshall tube amp. Just because an amp has big fat "tubes" and weights 22 Kg doesn't mean it's better.

Also, some people have lamented that the clean channel doesn't sound like a Fender Twin amp or that the crunch channels don't sound Marshall-ish. Marshall used Celestion speakers in their cabinets which contributed strongly to the Marshall sound. Fender used Jensen speakers. They sound completely different to a Celestion. So, if you want to reproduce "the sound", you need to connect the right speaker. Remember, this is not a modeler.

Sound vs playing feel vs acoustic experience:
Any modeler can sound like a Marshall. In a recording, the listener will not hear the difference. The nuances in sound are so small between various modelers and a real Marshall that a listener won't know. However, a modeler vs tube amp will appear to respond differently to the person playing it. A modeler is compressed, flat with few dynamics. A real amp reacts more subtly and with greater dynamics - and so does the Amp1 Mercury. I can pluck a note gently and the Amp1 correctly interprets that. A modeler equalises much of the tone and dynamics. That is why the Amp1 wins. In terms of the player's acoustic experience, a 100 Watt valve amp will violently push the coils in the speaker back and forth so that the speaker box vibrates as air is pushed around. That's the "roar" people talk about when sitting in front of a quad box driven by a Marshall tube amp. Oddly enough, despite being a class-D transistor power amp, the nanotube does help reproduce the "roar" effect fairly accurately. When going into my Music City speaker box, the sound was OK but going into my Marshall greenbacks...boy, that sound is awesome.

Verdict:
I think that Thomas Blug has golden ears and did a great job in designing this unit. There could be improvements but overall, this is not a modeler. This sounds like a tube amp. It's 100% analogue and the nanotube works. That's all there is to it. If I connect a Marshall cab to this amp no one will be able to tell the difference - not the person listening nor the person playing. I'm satisfied and I'm keeping it.
handling
features
sound
quality
14
1
Report

Report

J
The best feeling (& sounding) Marshall style amp I’ve played
Jellodog 18.09.2021
I’m totally in love with this amp. I've been after Marshall tones for a while and finally decided to buy the Amp1. I've been researching 'Marshall in a box' pedals for a few months but ultimately decided that I'd rather just have a full amp to keep things simple.

It's definitely a bright amp, but I read about the bright cap behaviour and I'm finding it pretty manageable with the treble knob at 3-ish (and the custom controls at half-way or below). Playing with a strat-style guitar (EBMM Cutlass) this thing screams.

My little rig includes the Amp1 ME, my Barefaced 1x12 cab with Neo Creamback and a Strymon Volante. That's it.

I'm so happy with this thing that I want to write Thomas Blug a thank-you letter.
handling
features
sound
quality
9
1
Report

Report

M7
SMALL, LIGHT AND CONVIENIENT - ANALOGUE! - SOUNDS AMAZING AND UNREAL
MONKEY 7 29.04.2021
Why lug a huge amp head around when you can purchase one of these. Thomas Blug is a genius and going to revolutionize the design of future amps and convienience.

I love the tones of this nano-tube amp and the channels you can choice between. The FX loop works perfectly with my FX unit .

The three overdrive sounds cover the full gamut of vintage, classic and modern distortion, from 60s Marshall Plexi crunch to the thick harmonic filth demanded for modern metal.

Flexibility aside, the Amp 1’s valve-driven 100-watt power amp is still its biggest attribute: plugged into a good 4x12 it sounds huge, with all the dynamic response you’d expect from valves and volume to spare. It’s almost unreal to hear so much tone coming from a package weighing just over a kilo.
handling
features
sound
quality
4
0
Report

Report

M
Not the perfect sound I expected
Mries 04.05.2019
I received my BluGuitar Amp1 a couple of days ago. And I have looked forward to it. The youtube clips where very convinsing, and the JTM45 sounded amazing.
I have plugged it in on a cabinet with V30 speaker, as adviced by Thomas. But the sounds where not my thing. The clean-, vintage- and classic channel had to much high frequencies. I compared it mostly with a fender supersonic 60, which is a very treble amp. The high frequencies hurt to my ears. Funny is that lowering the mids had most effect on this, more than lowering the treble. I also attached it to the speaker of a combo to be sure it was not the cabinet. Same sound.
The sound of the vintage channel gets much better when you open the gain. It rolls off lots of spiky highs.
But I like my amps for much headroom, very clean. And my drives are from pedals. The headroom of the clean and vintage channels is not enough, it compresses the OD's, I loose to much of the dynamics that I have with a 50+ tube amp.

The concept is great, I was loving the idea to have such a small top, combined with a nanocab, for gigging, jam sessions etc.
But, as I prefer a good sound over light travelling, I will send it back.


Btw. I did not really like the small knobs on the side, difficult to set them. On the other hand, the idea is that this is a one time setup, and you leave it there. But when you are searching for a good sound for initial setup it is not that handy.
handling
features
sound
quality
11
1
Report

Report

YouTube on this topic