To the page content

Korg SQ-64

42 Customer ratings

4.1 / 5

handling

features

sound

quality

16 Reviews

Korg SQ-64
$222
The shipping costs are calculated on the checkout page.
In stock
1
G
I spilled my coffee over it...
Gavalakis 11.11.2025
Ok, catchy headline here is the story. I was evaluating this and had decided to return it, but the day I was about to, I spilled my coffee over it, so.. yeah I couldn't return it anymore. (still works fine though, no sugar coffee).

So I forced myself to make use of it somehow and learn its quirks since I don't like having hardware sitting around doing nothing.

Long story short, I end up liking it more because I forced myself into exploiting its strengths and avoiding its weaknesses. (there is something to be said here about any tool)

- I initially bought it because I wanted an ableton-like pattern launching which this has. Only 3 other options in the market having that as far as I know and they cost a lot more. That part works quite well, albeit new patterns initialize at 16 steps which is a bummer, so I pre-initialize all patterns in an empty project I copy-paste around at 64. Wish there was an alternative option for that.

- Recording notes played on a keyboard works well without force quanitzation, thus it can have more than 4 bars at slow speeds, albeit no pitch/mod or any other automation can be recorded which is a bummer too. Wish it was possible to record even just 2 such things.

- I made an Ableton custom script (followed tutorials online) to use it as a controller for Ableton as well. Clip launching, track mute/solo/rec, play/stop/rec, track volume, and a small drum pad grid. There are many pads on this to make a layout I liked.

- I am not a person that enters notes into a sequencer one by one but rather plays them in a keyboard (except for drums), so all the features of doing so and editing melodic notes in a per step way, I have no use for and I find them cumbersome here as in most sequencers anyway.

- Most of the "performance" features here (reverse, bounce, random, fill notes, etc) I personaly have no use for and even if I did, I find them a bit cumbersome to use on the SQ64 due to jumping around different modes, so I don't use them.

Bottom line:
- For my dawless setup this is permanently in the "Patterns" mode to record new patterns with a midi keyboard and launch patterns in ableton-like fashion to make an arrangement on the fly ala live-looping style (but there is a quirk with the pattern lenghts in that).

- For my daw setup with ableton it is permantely in the "Control" mode as a daw controller able to do most things I want a controller to do (only possible after making my own custom script for ableton though).

For these things it works well and it might do for you too. I wouldn't use it for its other features or modes though, namely 1) entering notes per step (except maybe for drums), and 2) its "performance" features.

Build quiality is very good. It's compact and the cv outs are worth mentioning too (even though I just use midi).

Wishlist (just in case someone at Korg reads this and this piece of hardware is not dead):
- It would be awesome if while in "Patterns" mode, it was possible to mute/umute tracks (not possible now), as well as quickly change the patterns length and speed before launching them. Right now you have to launch the pattern first, then enter another mode (Gate), select the track to change the length, and finally return back to "patterns" mode, which is too much buttons for a live performance scenario. I mean, we could just hold down the pattern and move a knob to do this or something similar.

- Also while in "Patterns" mode, it would be awesome if the the rightmost 4x4 grid was possible to be drum pads (essentially customized midi notes and cc). Who needs 16 patterns per track in one project anyway..

- To be honest I have more wishes, but the 2 above are the most prominent. Wish it was possible for people to customize more things formware-wise because the hardware is good and it begs for it.
handling
features
sound
quality
1
0
Report

Report

t
A unique kind of sequencer
tksst 07.07.2024
Pros: hw built like a tank. If it included speed sensitive keys or battery operated it would be the total hw sequencer device.
Also, people are mentioning a learning curve, I found it very easy to use even after purchasing the Oxi One, it was for a time my go to device.
Cons: the major is the inclusion of only one mod /cc parameter. If Korg was able to solve this this would be a 5.
handling
features
sound
quality
1
0
Report

Report

h
Sequencer for those who do not use a computer..
htc2 22.03.2021
It is not a cheap toy, but the features go ok for that price. Solid case, the knobs could be more user friendly, also the lighting of the knobs, where you cannot tell from time to time if they are lit or not. The knobs are quite on the 'hard push' side, rubber made.

All in all the device is a great add, although the arpeggiator is not what you'd expect. Maybe in future firmware updates an improvement may be released.

Otherwise the handling is intuitive, but I would recommend to look for video tutorials on the web because the manual is quite modest regarding information on how to get the sequencer working in depht..

A modern hardware sequencer though. Recommended.
handling
features
sound
quality
1
1
Report

Report

G
Very good but not if you want to record a performance from a midi controller
Gonzalezmusiclab 03.05.2024
It’s a great sequencer if you want to write drum patterns and basic melodies, in the other hand, if you have a midi controller and connect it to the SQ-64 beware that you can only record one modulation per track, and that includes velocity… unfortunately for me that is a deal breaker, either sustain or velocity makes the whole playing keyboard and recording it to the SQ-64 far too limiting.
Other than that is a high quality product, sturdy, lots of functions, and comes with a lot of software.
One last thing I wish it came with the power adapter since the lights don’t light up that much only with the USB connection and beware that the midi cables are TYPE A.
handling
features
sound
quality
1
0
Report

Report

Sa
software is not so great, but hardware capabilities are enormous
Slava a 20.04.2023
this device is fine for 3 things.
1 sequencing drums, TR- sequencers style
2 sequencing external gear via the CV output cables. although i could only output via gate/pitch cables.
3 it can record notes/chords and play them back. but surely not for editing those.

the point about CV output is just great. now you can program any complex LFO movements, and output to your analog synth right away.
it took me a year to understand how highly usable it is.
eurorack modules for ONLY this capability should cost equal or more.
handling
features
sound
quality
1
0
Report

Report

Nc
Connectivity between modular
No concept 12.07.2025
Just invested hard earned sterling on a DFAM and a Labyrinth. Needed a sequencer to get these two under control and to do what I ask of them (without, they really are quite naughty 🤣). Always like the build and quality you get from korg, so the SQ64 was a no brainer. Brilliant value, plenty of things you can do with it and it looks kinda hot as well.
handling
features
sound
quality
0
0
Report

Report

B
Good sequencer
Broukaka 09.12.2025
Good sequencer, i use it for my modular. Took some time to get used to it but now it works great for me
handling
features
sound
quality
0
0
Report

Report

Korg SQ-64